In 2019, the number of people accepted through clearing rose by nearly 10% and exceeded 70,000.2 The profile of institutions entering clearing has shifted dramatically in recent years too, with 18 of the 24 most selective, Russell Group universities advertising 4,600 courses through clearing in 2019. Clearing is now, rightly, seen as a legitimate route for high quality applicants to secure a place at a university they want to study on a course they love.
All of these factors, combined with the increasingly widespread use of (usually lower) contextual offers, mean it’s time to re-think our approach to the guidance we give to students as they make their choices this spring. So, what should the advice be? Well, in a landscape that’s ever changing, there’s real benefit in keeping things simple.
If there are two offers to choose, then the Firm Acceptance should be the one the student wants the most. The subject they feel passionate about, the university they want to live and study in. As long as there is a realistic chance that the grades will be attained, choose it.
Students should not feel compelled to stick with the ‘highest grades = firm, lower grades = insurance’ mantra. In an environment in which aspirational offers are being made, universities are often more flexible during results week, and applying through clearing can lead to a brilliant course at a brilliant university, students should have the confidence to choose what’s right for them, not make preferences based on grade profiles.
Of course, the same advice applies; students should visit the universities they’re holding offers from, find out about the academic and social experience, research the costs of each institution and go where they (not their teachers, parents, friends) want. Then make the decision that’s right for them.
At a time of enormous choice, endless possibilities and myriad sources of advice, sometimes it’s best not to overcomplicate. There’ll be plenty of time for academic challenge when term starts in September 2020. Good luck!